Wasserman-Schultz Attacks Jeb Bush And Charlie Baker
As the President’s job approval numbers continue to plummet, along with being designated as the worst President since World War II, Democratic Party Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz is once again defaulting to climate change as a Party focal point. In an Op-ed piece today in the Huffington Post, Wasserman Schultz again displays not only here ignorance, but also provides validation as to why we are conservative.
Spewing from the mouth, Wasserman Schultz condemned both Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate Charlie Baker and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush for not acknowledging the correlation of CO2 emissions to things such as rising sea levels, increasing ocean temperatures, and even an increase in childhood asthma. Both Bush and Baker have voiced their concerns by saying that the science behind global warming has not convinced them of any doomsday scenario that continues to be spewed from the likes of Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
The DNC Chair continues to move the central theme of failed Obama administration policies to issues such as climate change. These issues tend to both rally the “herd” and attempt to deflect any intelligent conversation concerning failed liberal policies. Wasserman Shultz even offers a comparison to those who will not accept the tainted and politically biased ” science” surrounding climate change. She expressed how when she was diagnosed with breast cancer that did not reject the diagnosis by her doctor, citing she wasn’t an oncologist. However did her doctor make the diagnosis on a manual breast exam alone or did he biopsy the breast tissue for confirmation? Similar to the politically motivated “science” of global warming, it is our duty to ask for a second opinion. In Ms. Wasserman Shultz case, I’d be damned if I would have radical breast surgery or even a lumpectomy unless I first sought a second opinion. What Baker and Bush have found is that the second opinion regarding the influence of CO2 emissions on our climate has been refuted and refuted by many in the scientific community,
Wasserman-Shultz is continuing to press the ‘herd” into believing that the liberal politically motivated science of global warming is not up for dispute. We respect the difficulty of her position. However, having to resort to issues such as the “war on women” and climate change expresses how out of touch she is with the major issues such as the economy, national security, the federal debt, and the impending bankruptcy of entitlements. Why is that recently released polls have President Obama having been voted the worst President since World War II?